[lkml]   [2017]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink()
    > So if you would like to change the if-statement:

    It will need a small adjustment for the shown transformation.

    I was also unsure if the proposal will work in a single update step.

    > 1. Send a patch for vxcan.c to improve the error handling flow

    I am going to send a second approach for this update variant.

    > 2. Send a separate patch for all rtnl_configure_link() callers to unify the result check
    > Step 2 is optional ... and prepare yourself for more feedback ;-)

    I am curious on how software development aspects will evolve around
    desired error predicates.
    Which scope did you have in mind?


     \ /
      Last update: 2017-10-28 20:34    [W:6.694 / U:0.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site