[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: core: Use delayed work for hogs
* Linus Walleij <> [170111 07:34]:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Tony Lindgren <> wrote:
> > Below is an experimental fix to intorduce pinctrl_start() that I've
> > tested with pinctrl-single. Then we should probably make all pin controller
> > drivers call pinctrl_start() to properly fix the issue of struct pinctrl_dev
> > handle not being initialized before driver functions are called.
> Hm I guess that could work, but can we keep pinctrl_register() with the old
> semantics and add a separate pinctrl_register_and_defer()
> for those who just wanna start it later by a separate call?
> Then we don't need any special flags.

OK I'll take a look.

> > Or do you guys have any better ideas?
> Not really. So you mean revert the previous patch and apply something
> like this instead?

Let me first take a look to see if we can fix it by making drivers using
pinctrl_register_and_defer(). I'll post a patch for that today.

Then maybe for v4.12 we can attempt to move all pin controller drivers
to using it so we can fix the problem for good.



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-11 17:28    [W:0.093 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site