[lkml]   [2017]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: core: Use delayed work for hogs
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Tony Lindgren <> wrote:

> Below is an experimental fix to intorduce pinctrl_start() that I've
> tested with pinctrl-single. Then we should probably make all pin controller
> drivers call pinctrl_start() to properly fix the issue of struct pinctrl_dev
> handle not being initialized before driver functions are called.

Hm I guess that could work, but can we keep pinctrl_register() with the old
semantics and add a separate pinctrl_register_and_defer()
for those who just wanna start it later by a separate call?

Then we don't need any special flags.

> Or do you guys have any better ideas?

Not really. So you mean revert the previous patch and apply something
like this instead?

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-01-11 16:37    [W:0.224 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site