lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: OOM detection regressions since 4.7
Date
On Thursday 25 of August 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
wrote:
> > > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction
> > > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to
> > > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss.
> > >
> > > This sounds like the prudent option. Can we get 4.8 working
> > > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff
> > > for 4.9?
> >
> > OK, fair enough.
> >
> > I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with
> > this patch on top of the current Linus tree.
>
> Any luck with the testing of this patch?

Here my "rm -rf && cp -al" 10x in parallel test finished without OOM, so

Tested-by: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>

--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:0.156 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site