lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 +0000
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past
> two month.
>
> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
>
> Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
>
> Below is mtd folder structure we want:
> drivers/mtd/nand/<all-nand-core-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/<raw-nand-controller-drivers>
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/<spi-nand-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/<onenand-code>
> drivers/mtd/nand/chips/<manufacturer-spcific-code>

Hm, we should have a chips directory under each interface type, because
vendor specific handling is dependent on the NAND interface.
Otherwise, yes, that's the idea.


--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-25 10:01    [W:0.159 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site