[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration"
On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This reverts commit 909f7ee0b5f30f735e16864a7ed18d2e6123e6d9.
>> Apparently due to a wrongly resolved merge conflict between two
>> branches, which contained the same commit, the commit contents
>> partially was added two times in a row.
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches.

Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe:


I think it's sensible to keep at least the summary line of
a 'git revert' intact rather than inventing our own.

That discussion was about a8cf81ffe028 '(Revert "[ARM] unconditionally
define __virt_to_phys and __phys_to_virt")'

With best wishes,

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-25 16:01    [W:0.162 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site