[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] inotify: Convert to using per-namespace limits

On 8.12.2016 03:40, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nikolay Borisov <> writes:
>> Gentle ping, now that rc1 has shipped and Jan's sysctl concern hopefully
>> resolved.
> After getting slowed down by some fixes I am now taking a hard look at
> your patch in the hopes of merging it.
> Did you happen to see the kbuild test roboot boot failures and did you
> happen to look into what caused them? I have just skimmed them and it
> appears to be related to your patch.

I saw them in the beginning but they did look like a generic memory
corruption and I believe at the time those patches were submitted there
was a lingering memory corruption hitting various patches. Thus I didn't
think it was related to my patches. I've since left my work so been
taking a bit of time off and haven't looked really hard, so those
patches have been kind of lingering.

But now that you mention it I will try and take a second look to see
what might cause the memory corruption? Is there a way to force 0day to
re-run them to see whether the failure was indeed caused by my patches
or were intermittent?


> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-08 07:59    [W:0.102 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site