Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:55:28 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: [net/mm PATCH v2 0/3] Page fragment updates | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:54:14 -0800
> Dave, I was wondering if you would be okay with me trying to push the > three patches though net-next. I'm thinking I might scale back the > first patch so that it is just a rename instead of making any > functional changes. The main reason why I am thinking of trying to > submit through net-next is because then I can then start working on > submitting the driver patches for net-next. Otherwise I'm looking at > this set creating a merge mess since I don't see a good way to push > the driver changes without already having these changes present. > > I'll wait until Andrew can weigh in on the patches before > resubmitting. My thought was to get an Acked-by from him and then see > if I can get them accepted into net-next. That way there isn't any > funky cross-tree merging that will need to go on, and it shouldn't > really impact the mm tree all that much as the only consumers for the > page frag code are the network stack anyway.
I'm fine with this plan.
|  |