lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems
Hi Catalin,

On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can
> > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please
> > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :).
> > Otherwise I'm going to:
> >
> > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8
> > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7
> > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9
>
> I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have
> been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc).
>
> > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way?
>
> Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT
> for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though.
>

Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some
confusion.

I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for
arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks
good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64
branch with the new version:

git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64

Best,

- Juri

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-03 06:38    [W:0.087 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site