lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-state binding
From
Date
On 11/23/2016 08:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-11-16, 18:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 11/23, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> writes:
>>>> On 23 November 2016 at 16:51, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>>>> Then, at least for this use case, we're talking about voltage, not some
>>>>> unspecified units.
>> In some cases we actually know the voltage of the domain and
>> would want to put some voltage mapping in DT. For example, level
>> 1 is voltage 2V and level 2 is voltage 2.5V.
> But even in these cases we wouldn't be using the voltage values within the
> kernel as we will be giving only a performance state to the M3 core, right?

Nope. In these cases we need to set a certain voltage and we do that by
requesting it via the M3 core.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-28 19:31    [W:0.084 / U:0.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site