[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:10:35PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Maybe add a comment here why you can't use cpu_has (yet).

So that could be alleviated by moving this function *after*
init_scattered_cpuid_features(). Then you can simply do *cpu_has().

Also, I'm not sure why we're checking CPUID for the SME feature when we
have sme_get_me_mask() et al which have been setup much earlier...


Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-15 13:15    [W:0.082 / U:1.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site