lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 3.16 267/346] ARM: sa1111: fix pcmcia suspend/resume
3.16.39-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

commit 06dfe5cc0cc684e735cb0232fdb756d30780b05d upstream.

SA1111 PCMCIA was broken when PCMCIA switched to using dev_pm_ops for
the PCMCIA socket class. PCMCIA used to handle suspend/resume via the
socket hosting device, which happened at normal device suspend/resume
time.

However, the referenced commit changed this: much of the resume now
happens much earlier, in the noirq resume handler of dev_pm_ops.

However, on SA1111, the PCMCIA device is not accessible as the SA1111
has not been resumed at _noirq time. It's slightly worse than that,
because the SA1111 has already been put to sleep at _noirq time, so
suspend doesn't work properly.

Fix this by converting the core SA1111 code to use dev_pm_ops as well,
and performing its own suspend/resume at noirq time.

This fixes these errors in the kernel log:

pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: time out after reset
pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: time out after reset

and the resulting lack of PCMCIA cards after a S2RAM cycle.

Fixes: d7646f7632549 ("pcmcia: use dev_pm_ops for class pcmcia_socket_class")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -872,9 +872,9 @@ struct sa1111_save_data {

#ifdef CONFIG_PM

-static int sa1111_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+static int sa1111_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
- struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct sa1111_save_data *save;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int val;
@@ -937,9 +937,9 @@ static int sa1111_suspend(struct platfor
* restored by their respective drivers, and must be called
* via LDM after this function.
*/
-static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int sa1111_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
- struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct sa1111_save_data *save;
unsigned long flags, id;
void __iomem *base;
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
id = sa1111_readl(sachip->base + SA1111_SKID);
if ((id & SKID_ID_MASK) != SKID_SA1111_ID) {
__sa1111_remove(sachip);
- platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
+ dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
kfree(save);
return 0;
}
@@ -1006,8 +1006,8 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
}

#else
-#define sa1111_suspend NULL
-#define sa1111_resume NULL
+#define sa1111_suspend_noirq NULL
+#define sa1111_resume_noirq NULL
#endif

static int sa1111_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -1041,6 +1041,11 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform
return 0;
}

+static struct dev_pm_ops sa1111_pm_ops = {
+ .suspend_noirq = sa1111_suspend_noirq,
+ .resume_noirq = sa1111_resume_noirq,
+};
+
/*
* Not sure if this should be on the system bus or not yet.
* We really want some way to register a system device at
@@ -1053,11 +1058,10 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform
static struct platform_driver sa1111_device_driver = {
.probe = sa1111_probe,
.remove = sa1111_remove,
- .suspend = sa1111_suspend,
- .resume = sa1111_resume,
.driver = {
.name = "sa1111",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pm = &sa1111_pm_ops,
},
};

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-14 04:35    [W:0.856 / U:1.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site