lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arch/x86: Fix kdump on x86 with physically hotadded CPUs
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > On 10/04/2016 06:58 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > While it is the right thing to initialize the package map in that case, it
> > > still papers over a robustness issue in the uncore code, which needs to be
> > > fixed first.
> >
> > I will include a separate patch with an error check for pkg == 0xffff in the
> > uncore code.
>
> 0xffff? That won't help. The id returned is -1 if the entry is not
> initialized. And aside of that just patching that particular place is not
> helping as the uncore code and also rapl is relying on the package map
> being populated.
>
> So we need a sanity check in the initialization code which prevents any of
> this being executed.

I still need to test this, but how about something like this?

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 28865938aadf..61d087a2f25d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -598,8 +598,13 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)

static int rapl_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
+ int pkg = topology_logical_package_id(cpu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(pkg == -1))
+ return -EINVAL;

+ pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
if (pmu)
return 0;

@@ -613,7 +618,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
pmu->cpu = -1;
rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
- rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_package_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->pmus[pkg] = pmu;
return 0;
}

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 463dc7a5a6c3..3f657fbbf787 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
{
const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
struct intel_uncore_init_fun *uncore_init;
- int pret = 0, cret = 0, ret;
+ int pret = 0, cret = 0, ret, cpu;

id = x86_match_cpu(intel_uncore_match);
if (!id)
@@ -1363,6 +1363,13 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)

max_packages = topology_max_packages();

+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ int pkg = topology_logical_package_id(cpu);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(pkg == -1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
uncore_init = (struct intel_uncore_init_fun *)id->driver_data;
if (uncore_init->pci_init) {
pret = uncore_init->pci_init();
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-05 18:15    [W:0.143 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site