[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectaio: questions with ioctx_alloc() and large num_possible_cpus()
Hi Benjamin, Kent, and others,

Would you please comment / answer about this possible problem?
Any feedback is appreciated.

Since commit e1bdd5f27a5b ("aio: percpu reqs_available") the maximum
number of aio nr_events may be a function of num_possible_cpus() and
actually be /inversely proportional/ to it (i.e., more CPUs lead to
less system-wide aio nr_events). This is a problem on larger systems.

That's because if "nr_events < num_possible_cpus() * 4" (for example
nr_events == 1) that counts as "num_possible_cpus() * 4" into aio_nr
and against aio_max_nr

static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsigned nr_events)
nr_events = max(nr_events, num_possible_cpus() * 4);
nr_events *= 2;
/* limit the number of system wide aios */
if (aio_nr + nr_events > (aio_max_nr * 2UL) ||
err = -EAGAIN;
aio_nr += ctx->max_reqs;

That problem is easily noticeable on a common POWER8 system: 160 CPUs
(2 sockets * 10 cores/socket * 8 threads/core = 160 CPUs) limits the max
AIO contexts with "io_setup(1, )" to 102 out of 64k (default ax_aio_nr):

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible

# cat /proc/sys/fs/aio-max-nr

# echo $(( 65536 / (160 * 4) ))

test-case snippet & output:

for (i = 0; i < 65536; i++)
if (rc = io_setup(1, &ioctx[i]))

printf("rc = %d, i = %d\n", rc, i);

> rc = -11, i = 102

(another problem is that the sysctl aio-nr grows larger than aio-max-nr,
since it's checked against "aio_max_nr * 2")


I've been trying to understand/fix this, but soon got stuck on options
as I didn't quite get a few points.. if you could provide some insight,
please, that would be really helpful:

- why "num_possible_cpus() * 4", and why "max(nr_events, <it>)" ?

Is it just related to req_batch in a form of a reasonable constant,
or there are other implications (e.g., related to "up to half of
slots on other cpu's percpu counters" -- which would be nice to
understand why too.)

- "struct kioctx" says max_reqs is

" is what userspace passed to io_setup(), it's not used for
anything but counting against the global max_reqs quota. "

However, we see it incremented by the modified nr_events, thus
not really the value from userspace anymore, and used to derive
nr_events in aio_setup_ring(). Is the comment wrong nowadays,
or is the code usage of max_reqs wrong/abusing it, or... ? :)

- what's really expected to be counted by aio-nr is nr_events
(er.. the value actually requested by userspace?) or the number
of times io_setup(N, ) returned successfully (say, io contexts),
regardless of the total/sum of their nr_events?

- any other comments/suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-05 00:56    [W:0.105 / U:1.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site