lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRFC if==else in halbtc8723b1ant.c

Hi !

in your commit f5b586909581 ("rtlwifi: btcoexist: Modify driver to support
BT coexistence in rtl8723be") you introduced a if/else where both branches
are the same but the comment in the else branch suggests that this might be
unintended.

from code review only I can´t say what the intent is.

/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8723b1ant.c:halbtc8723b1ant_action_wifi_connected_bt_acl_busy()

1838 if ((bt_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
1839 (bt_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH)) {
1840 halbtc8723b1ant_ps_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC,
1841 true, 14);
1842 coex_dm->auto_tdma_adjust = false;
1843 } else { /*for low BT RSSI*/
1844 halbtc8723b1ant_ps_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC,
1845 true, 14);
1846 coex_dm->auto_tdma_adjust = false;
1847 }

basically the same construct is also in
halbtc8723b1ant_run_coexist_mechanism()

2213 if ((wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
2214 (wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH)) {
2215 halbtc8723b1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
2216 NORMAL_EXEC,
2217 1, 1, 1, 1);
2218 } else {
2219 halbtc8723b1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
2220 NORMAL_EXEC,
2221 1, 1, 1, 1);
2222 }

where the if condition is the same so the else may also only apply to the
low BT RSSI - and the if and else are again the same - if this is intended
or not is not clear. If this is intended it should have appropriate comments.

thx!
hofrat

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-30 12:04    [W:0.030 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site