Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] IB/mlx5: Simplify completion into a wait_event | From | Sagi Grimberg <> | Date | Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:17:57 +0200 |
| |
On 27/10/16 09:59, Binoy Jayan wrote: > Convert the completion 'mlx5_ib_umr_context:done' to a wait_event as it > just waits for the return value to be filled. > > Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 9 +++++---- > include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h > index de31b5f..cf496b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mw { > struct mlx5_ib_umr_context { > struct ib_cqe cqe; > enum ib_wc_status status; > - struct completion done; > + wait_queue_head_t wq; > }; > > struct umr_common { > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c > index dfaf6f6..49ff2af 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c > @@ -846,14 +846,14 @@ static void mlx5_ib_umr_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc) > container_of(wc->wr_cqe, struct mlx5_ib_umr_context, cqe); > > context->status = wc->status; > - complete(&context->done); > + wake_up(&context->wq); > } > > static inline void mlx5_ib_init_umr_context(struct mlx5_ib_umr_context *context) > { > context->cqe.done = mlx5_ib_umr_done; > - context->status = -1; > - init_completion(&context->done); > + context->status = IB_WC_STATUS_NONE; > + init_waitqueue_head(&context->wq); > } > > static inline int mlx5_ib_post_send_wait(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, > @@ -873,7 +873,8 @@ static inline int mlx5_ib_post_send_wait(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, > if (err) { > mlx5_ib_warn(dev, "UMR post send failed, err %d\n", err); > } else { > - wait_for_completion(&umr_context.done); > + wait_event(umr_context.wq, > + umr_context.status != IB_WC_STATUS_NONE);
How is this simpler?
> enum ib_wc_status { > + IB_WC_STATUS_NONE = -1, > IB_WC_SUCCESS, > IB_WC_LOC_LEN_ERR, > IB_WC_LOC_QP_OP_ERR, >
Huh? Where did this bogus status came from? IMHO, this is polluting the verbs interface for no good reason at all, sorry.
|  |