[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.4 022/118] IB/uverbs: Fix race between uverbs_close and remove_one
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:28:40PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:

> This lock is literally called "cleanup mutex" and it's not really
> documented what data it protects. Is there a better solution here?

I agree it is very complex and hard to understand. This is why it
needed patching :| The mutex is in fact pretty much locking
code. (ensuring that ib_uverbs_cleanup_ucontext only runs on one
thread during this race)

There are at least three locks involved in this process. I didn't see
any obvious way to extend any of the other locks to handle this case.

The argument against most simple solutions (eg a rw lock rather than
the srcu) has been performance on these paths.


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-03 19:06    [W:0.135 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site