[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Vivek Gautam
<> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Stephen Boyd <> wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 07:28 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> From: Yaniv Gardi <>
>>> Since in future UFS Phy's the tx_iface_clk and rx_iface_clk
>>> are no longer exist, we should not fail when their initialization
>>> fail, but rather just report with debug message.
>>> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <>
>>> ---
>> Shouldn't we have a different compatible string on future UFS phys so
>> that we know which number of clks and what clks are required? That's how
>> we typically handle clk configurations changing. Making them optional
>> should really only be needed when they're really optional, i.e. things
>> will work fine if they're there or not.
> Correct. It makes sense to have different compatible strings for different
> versions.
> I will gather more information about previous versions that required
> this clock, and update as suggested.

The tx/rx_face clocks are not available on some of the recent chips,
such as msm8996. Older chips with this 14nm ufs phy had handles
for tx/rx_iface clocks.
So, i will add new compatible string for msm8996 -
This can be used with chips further on that are going to use the same ufs phy.


Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-29 22:22    [W:0.087 / U:22.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site