Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Sun, 16 Oct 2016 08:55:41 -0700 |
| |
On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : >>>> Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: >>>> at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with >>>> at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog >>>> times out while the CPU is in idle state. Removing the >>>> AT91_WDT_WDIDLEHLT flag that was set by default fixes this. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com> >>>> Fixes: 5161b31dc39a ("watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support") >>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ >>> >>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> >>> >>> However, we don't really care about that for kernels after 3.18 as no >>> users are using pdata anymore. >>> I think you could send a follow-up patch removing pdata support >>> completely. >> >> Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline >> and therefore wasn't applied to stable branches. >> > Possibly that happened because you did not copy the watchdog mailing list. >
... and your other patches were not sent to the watchdog mailing list either, so you should not expect them to be picked up either.
Seriously, how do you expect _any_ patch to be picked up if you neither copy the subsystem mailing list nor the subsystem maintainer ?
Guenter
|  |