Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry v3 per ACPI 6.1 | From | Suzuki K Poulose <> | Date | Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:28:58 +0100 |
| |
On 13/10/16 20:37, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > Hello Suzuki, > > On 10/13/2016 2:50 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 12/10/16 23:10, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>>> Please could you keep the people who reviewed/commented on your series in the past, >>>> whenever you post a new version ? >>> Do you mean to just send the new version to their e-mail directly in addition to the lists? If so, I will do that next time. >> >> If you send a new version of a series to the list, it is a good idea to keep >> the people who commented (significantly) on your previous version in Cc, especially >> when you have addressed their feedback. That will help them to keep track of the >> series. People can always see the new version in the list, but then it is so easy >> to miss something in the 100s of emails you get each day. I am sure people have >> special filters for the emails based on if they are in Cc/To etc. >> > Okay, understood. I'll make sure to add those who have commented in the cc/to list to avoid the e-mail filters.
Thanks !
>> Is it always the same endianness as that of the CPU ? > It is a fair assumption that the firmware populating this record will use a CPU of the same endianness. There is no mechanism in the spec to indicate otherwise.
Yep, you are right. The EFI expects the EL2/EL1 to be of the same endianness
Cheers Suzuki
|  |