[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery
    On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:01:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
    > While that isn't a horrible idea, it's also not something that we've
    > enforced at *all* in the past. Would you suggest that we do this only
    > for features in the generic CPUID leaves, or all features?

    There's no reason to do anything really: the 0x0... CPUID leaf is owned
    by Intel and 0x8... by AMD. So far, if AMD implements a feature in the
    Intel leaf, it sets the respective CPUID bit. So a feature can be
    present in multiple vendors. Thus you don't need the vendor name in the


    SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

     \ /
      Last update: 2016-10-10 18:19    [W:10.426 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site