Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:18:21 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery |
| |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:01:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > While that isn't a horrible idea, it's also not something that we've > enforced at *all* in the past. Would you suggest that we do this only > for features in the generic CPUID leaves, or all features?
There's no reason to do anything really: the 0x0... CPUID leaf is owned by Intel and 0x8... by AMD. So far, if AMD implements a feature in the Intel leaf, it sets the respective CPUID bit. So a feature can be present in multiple vendors. Thus you don't need the vendor name in the define.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) --
|  |