Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:51:37 +0200 | From | John Einar Reitan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Secure Memory Allocation Framework |
| |
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:42:17AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > probably should keep the discussion on github (USAGE.md was updated a > bit more and merged into https://github.com/cubanismo/allocator so > look there for the latest).. > > but briefly: > > 1) my expectation is if the user is implementing some use-case, it > knows what devices and APIs are involved, otherwise it wouldn't be > able to pass a buffer to that device/API..
As I described at Linaro Connect late-connected devices could cause new constrains to appear. I.e. some (additonal) HDMI connection or WiFi Display etc. Including all the might-happen devices might lead to unoptimal buffers just to be able to handle some rarely-happen events.
I guess the easy resolve here is for the user to do a reallocation with the new constraints added and replace the buffer(s) in question, but with a slight lag in enabling the new device.
John
|  |