[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] README: cosmetic fixes
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Diego Viola <> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Diego Viola <> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Jonathan Corbet <> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:53:02 -0200
>>> Diego Viola <> wrote:
>>>> The thing I'm unsure about is that the pull request contained trivial
>>>> changes from others as well, and my patch was trivial, yes.
>>>> So why not include my changes with the other trivial changes as well?
>>> I set aside when I raised my initial complaint, and it stayed set aside.
>> After your complaint, I provided and suggested examples about
>> improving the section in the README that you complained about, I also
>> asked for your feedback, but you remained silent.
>> I was hoping to get your feedback and we would improve that section together.
>>> I'll consider it again, but I'm not very enthusiastic about applying
>>> stylistic fixes. We really don't need trivial patch wars over how many
>>> exclamation points belong on a given sentence.
>> I understand, but the exclamation point is just one fix, there are
>> other fixes in my patch.
>>> Diego, I'd like to ask you to sit back a bit and think about what you are
>>> really trying to accomplish. Maintainers are busy people, and you place a
>>> demand on their time whenever you post a patch. That time is available in
>>> *very* limited quantities for patches that don't really make the kernel
>>> better. Please think a bit about why you're doing this, and how you might
>>> direct your energy toward creating changes that maintainers actively want
>>> to apply. That will leave everybody better off than nagging people about
>>> cosmetic changes.
>> I'm just trying to improve the documentation, I want to improve the
>> state of the documentation and the README, why is this so hard to do?
>> I understand you don't have the time to review small patches like
>> mine, so wouldn't it make sense to delegate this work or activity to
>> someone else that has the time?
>>> Thanks,
>>> jon
>> Thanks,
>> Diego
> Would you consider my patch if I send another patch that addresses the
> complaint you brought it up?
> No rush, apologies for that.
> Diego

I've just sent a new email that I hope will address the complaints you
mentioned earlier.


 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-19 08:01    [W:0.056 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site