[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:51:00PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> I understand and disagree. I think you're being overzealous in trying
> to bludgeon people into doing things the way you think they should be
> done.

So I did explain why it is better to do microcode updates from the
initrd. And nowhere in that explanation I am "bludgeoning" people into
doing things the way I want. Which is silly, I'd never even *think* of
wanting to do that - I have enough other shit to deal with.

But I guess you're reading it the way you wanna read it so I'm going to
leave you thinking whatever you want to think.

> From the point of view of the actual update mechanism, what difference
> does it make where the microcode data was retrieved from? If you want
> to warn about what you consider "unsafe" updates, do that when the
> update happens instead. With this patch, simply enabling BLK_DEV_INITRD
> will shut up the warning even if an initrd is never actually used.
> Also, what do modules have to do with anything?

This reads like your mail from a couple of days ago. Which leads me to
think that you haven't understood at all what I've been writing this
whole time.

So I'm going to stop wasting time with you.


SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-18 17:01    [W:0.181 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site