lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig
Date
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:11:49PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Wasn't the idea *not* to disable CONFIG_MICROCODE?
>
> Is the error message not understandable?
>
> +MSG="\nYou have CONFIG_MICROCODE enabled without BLK_DEV_INITRD. The preferred\n\
> +way is to enable it and make sure microcode is added to your initrd as\n\
> +explained in Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt. This is also the\n\
> +most tested method as the majority of distros do it. Alternatively, and\n\
> +if you don't want to enable modules, you should make sure the microcode\n\
> +is built into the kernel.\n"

I understand and disagree. I think you're being overzealous in trying
to bludgeon people into doing things the way you think they should be
done.

From the point of view of the actual update mechanism, what difference
does it make where the microcode data was retrieved from? If you want
to warn about what you consider "unsafe" updates, do that when the
update happens instead. With this patch, simply enabling BLK_DEV_INITRD
will shut up the warning even if an initrd is never actually used.
Also, what do modules have to do with anything?

--
Måns Rullgård

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-18 16:21    [W:0.095 / U:1.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site