[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 5/6] rtc: max77xxx: add RTC driver for Maxim MAX77xxx series RTC IP
Hello Laxman and Krzysztof,

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Laxman Dewangan <> wrote:
> On Monday 18 January 2016 09:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15.01.2016 10:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Laxman Dewangan <>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 06:50 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 14.01.2016 09:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>>> The max77802 does exactly the same (BTW, these should be merged as
>>>>>> well... I'll add this to the TODO list) so I think this is necessary.
>>>>> How about merging max77802 to max77686 first? The only differences I
>>>>> found are:
>>>>> 1. It uses main MFD/PMIC regmap.
>>>>> This can be solved as part of decoupling code. The driver will get
>>>>> MFD's regmap and set up its own (only on max77686). The max77802 will
>>>>> only use parent's regmap.
>>>>> 2. It has different register address.
>>>>> We need a register-layout/configuration structure. The logic is
>>>>> the
>>>>> same except few differences (e.g. presence of MAX77802_RTC_AE1).
>>>>> It may be easier to merge them now, before adding support for max77620?
>>> Agreed.
>>> When I originally posted the max77802 support, I had separate MFD,
>>> RTC, regulator and clock drivers and the feedback (IIRC) was that the
>>> MFD and clock blocks were too similar to the max77686 so I extended
>>> those drivers instead of adding new ones. But that the RTC and
>>> regulator blocks were different so a separate driver was justified...
>>> but it's true that are not that different and rtc-max77686 could be
>>> extended and rtc-max77802 removed.
>> Great!
>>> In fact, the ChromiumOS vendor tree has a single RTC driver for both
>>> max77686 and max77802:
>>>>> I could handle this probably next week or in the following week
>>>>> (assuming someone would test max77802 because I don't have the
>>>>> hardware).
>>> I could also work on this next week if you want. After all I feel
>>> guilty for the code duplication :-)
>> So feel free to take that job from me. :) I will happily do the testing
>> and provide complains (I mean, comments).
> Hi Javier,
> If you can provide the patch for moving MAX77802 to MAX77686 then I can
> create the other change to move the regmap and i2c dummy client for rtc of
> max77686 to rtc driver from core on top of your change. This will
> completely decouple the rtc driver from core and so will be easy to use for
> other chip MAX77620.

Ok, sounds like a plan. I'll just do the change to extend rtc-max77686
to support the max77802 rtc then and let the other change to you.

I'll work on this today once I finish other task that I'm currently working on.

> Thanks,
> Laxman

Best regards,

 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-18 14:21    [W:0.072 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site