lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/hvm/params: Add a new delivery type for event-channel in HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/01/16 12:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> >>
> >> Add a new delivery type:
> >> val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag: val[7:0] is a PPI.
> >> To the flag, bit 0 stands the interrupt mode is edge(1) or level(0) and
> >> bit 1 stands the interrupt polarity is active low(1) or high(0).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> >> index a6c7991..550688a 100644
> >> --- a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> >> +++ b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
> >> * Domain = val[47:32], Bus = val[31:16],
> >> * DevFn = val[15: 8], IntX = val[ 1: 0]
> >> * val[63:56] == 2: val[7:0] is a vector number.
> >> + * val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag of event-channel interrupt:
> >> + * bit 0: interrupt is edge(1) or level(0) triggered
> >> + * bit 1: interrupt is active low(1) or high(0)
> >> + * val[7:0] is PPI number used by event-channel.
> >> + * This is only used by ARM/ARM64.
> >> * If val == 0 then CPU0 event-channel notifications are not delivered.
> >> */
> >> #define HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ 0
> > Andrew, I think that this patch is correct. Looking back at your
> > previous comment (http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=144804014214262&w=2),
> > is it possible that you were confused by enum callback_via_type, which
> > is internal to Xen and offset'ed by 1 compared to the described values
> > in xen/include/public/hvm/params.h?
> >
> > If not, and indeed somebody introduced one more field but failed to
> > document it, then I suggest she sends a patch to fix the issue as soon
> > as possible.
>
> I was indeed confused - the ABI is utterly mad.

All right. In that case, Shannon, you can add my

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>


> However, this change does need rebasing over c/s ca5c54b, which was the
> result of the original discussion.

c/s ca5c54b is for Xen, while this is a Linux patch (Linux has its own
set of Xen headers).

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-18 14:21    [W:0.058 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site