lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks
On 11-01-16, 23:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:35:45PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * Iterate over governors
> > + *
> > + * cpufreq_governor_list is protected by cpufreq_governor_mutex.
> > + */
> > +static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_governor_list);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_mutex);
> > +#define for_each_governor(__governor) \
> > + list_for_each_entry(__governor, &cpufreq_governor_list, governor_list)
>
> So you could stuff the lockdep_assert_held() you later add intididually
> into the for_each_governor macro, impossible to forget that way.

How exactly? I couldn't see how it can be done in a neat and clean
way.

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-12 11:21    [W:0.268 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site