Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390 | From | Shuah Khan <> | Date | Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:56:19 -0600 |
| |
On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree? >> >> -Kees >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: >>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements >>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional >>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced >>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid >>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >>> --- > > > Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it > up for 4.3-rc1. >
Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment
"This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc tests."
This one probably should go through PowerPc tree.
Adding Michael Ellerman to the thread,. Michael! Something you can take in for 4.3-rc1??
thanks, -- Shuah
-- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
|  |