lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] Revert "task_work: remove fifo ordering guarantee"
On 09/09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Again, rightly or not I believe that FIFO makes task_work_add() more useful.
> > Perhaps I am wrong, so far I can only provide the artificial examples...
>
> I'd rather wait until somebody has a real use case. I hate adding
> infrastructure for "what if.." scenarios. We're better off if we can
> make do with minimal semantics (ie "there are no guarantees except
> that the work will be done before returning to user space") than with
> stronger semantics that people then perhaps start depending on even if
> they didn't really need them.

OK, I see. Thanks.

At least you seem to agree with 1-2, so if Al takes these changes we
can easily reconsider 3/3 later, if/when we have the new user which
needs FIFO.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-09 19:01    [W:0.034 / U:1.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site