lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] [v2] intel_pstate: Fix user input of min/max to legal policy region
Date
In current code, max_perf_pct might be smaller than min_perf_pct
by improper user input:

$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100

$ echo 80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct

$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100

Fix this problem by 2 steps:
1.Normalize the user input to [min_policy, max_policy].
2.Make sure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct, suggested by Seiichi Ikarashi.

Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
v2:
- Add logic to ensure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct.
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index fcb929e..a0b935f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,

limits.max_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100);
limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct);
+ limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct);
+ limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_perf_pct, limits.max_perf_pct);
limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));

if (hwp_active)
@@ -442,6 +444,8 @@ static ssize_t store_min_perf_pct(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,

limits.min_sysfs_pct = clamp_t(int, input, 0 , 100);
limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct);
+ limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct);
+ limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct);
limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));

if (hwp_active)
@@ -985,12 +989,19 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)

limits.min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
limits.min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.min_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
- limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct);
- limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
-
limits.max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
limits.max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits.max_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
+
+ /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */
+ limits.min_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.min_sysfs_pct);
+ limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.min_perf_pct);
limits.max_perf_pct = min(limits.max_policy_pct, limits.max_sysfs_pct);
+ limits.max_perf_pct = max(limits.min_policy_pct, limits.max_perf_pct);
+
+ /* Make sure min_perf_pct <= max_perf_pct */
+ limits.min_perf_pct = min(limits.max_perf_pct, limits.min_perf_pct);
+
+ limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));

if (hwp_active)
--
1.8.4.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-09 12:41    [W:0.067 / U:1.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site