[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC 5/6] staging: board: Add support for devices with complex dependencies
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Dan Carpenter <> wrote:
>> + error = clk_register_clkdev(clk, bsc->con_id, bsc->dev_id);
>> + if (error)
>> + pr_err("Failed to register clock %s (%d)\n", bsc->clk, error);
>> + return error;
> Missing curly braces. Also it's weird that don't we need a clk_put()
> on the error patch as well as the success path?


So it worked only by accident: with the new per-user struct clk instances
clk_put() must not be called if clk_register_clkdev() succeeded.

Will call clk_put() only if it failed.

>> +
>> + clk_put(clk);
>> + return 0;



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-03 16:01    [W:0.145 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site