[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of: Custom printk format specifier for device node
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 21:52 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thinking about this more, I'd like to suggest a different format that
> gives us a nice hack on the name that makes it easy to remember:
> '%pOF[...]'
> 'O' still means 'object', but it is also overloaded for Open Firmware.
> That still leaves %pO? for other object types. What do you think?

I think that's fine.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-01 07:41    [W:0.069 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site