[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Using regmap_update_bits to update a write only register
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:14:14PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2015 7:54 PM, "Mark Brown" <> wrote:

> > Probably, or there's a bug. What should happen is that if the register
> > default appeared successfully then the read will get statisfied from the
> > cache in the manner you describe - presumably that's gone wrong somehow.
> > Have you set num_reg_defaults? That's the obvious thing...

> Did that. I will have a closer look. Thanks for the answer.

OK, the other thing that springs to mind to check is that the register
didn't somehow get marked as volatile.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-06 12:41    [W:0.055 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site