[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.0-rc1 v17 5/6] x86/nmi: Use common printk functions
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 01:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Thompson <> wrote:
> > Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support
> > safe all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to
> > make it accessible to other architectures.
> >
> > Port the x86 NMI backtrace to the generic code.
> Is there any difference between the generic and the x86 code as they
> stand today?

Shouldn't be any user observable change but there are some changes,
mostly due to review comments.

1. The seq_buf structures are initialized at boot and *after* they
are consumed (originally they were initialized just before use).

2. The generic code doesn't maintain an equivalent of backtrace_mask
(which was essentially a copy of cpus_online made when backtracing
was requested) and instead iterates using for_each_possible_cpu()
to initialize and dump the seq_buf:s.


The main piece that git code motion tracking should follow if I squashed
the generic and x86 patches together would be nmi_vprintk(). I suspect
most of the rest would be missed as the code copies is in pretty small

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-05 13:41    [W:0.069 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site