[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] x86/fpu: don't abuse drop_init_fpu() in flush_thread()
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:55:42PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> But please look at drop_init_fpu(). If eagerfpu == F it calls drop_fpu() and
> this is what we need. flush_thread() already has the "if (!use_eager_fpu())",
> we can shift drop_fpu() there.
> Otherwise, if eagerfpu == T, drop_init_fpu() does restore_init_xstate() and
> this just burns CPU. Until flush_thread user_has_fpu/used_math this state
> restore_init_xstate() is pointless, this state will be lost after preemption.

Yeah, I was wondering why that's there.

One example where drop_init_fpu() seems to make sense is
__kernel_fpu_end(): kernel is done with FPU and current was using the
FPU prior so let's restore it for the eagerfpu case.



ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-13 17:41    [W:0.196 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site