Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:14:36 +0000 | From | Markos Chandras <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures) |
| |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > [Add Ralf to cc] > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > > > Build results: > > total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12 > > Failed builds: > > mips:defconfig > > mips:allmodconfig > > mips:bcm47xx_defconfig > > mips:bcm63xx_defconfig > > mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig > > mips:ath79_defconfig > > mips:ar7_defconfig > > mips:fuloong2e_defconfig > > mips:e55_defconfig > > mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig > > mips:malta_defconfig > > sparc64:allmodconfig > > > > mips builds are all failing with > > > > Building mips:defconfig ... failed > > -------------- > > Error log: > > arch/mips/kernel/genex.S: Assembler messages: > > arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: Bad value (mips64r6) for internal use > > arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: unknown ISA level 64r6 > > > > This was introduced by commit 0bf705e94771800 ("MIPS: kernel: genex: Set > > correct ISA level") which apparently assumes that only mips64r6 is a valid > > ISA level, though it is obviously not supported on older compilers. This > > is on top of the other mips r6 related build errors seen yesterday. > > > > I really hope that this is not 3.20 material, given the lack of testing > > with architectures other than mips r6 or with older compilers. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
This is just a typo I introduced yesterday by mistake. This has been fixed in the meantime but it did not make it in today's linux-next.
-- markos
|  |