Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:54:57 -0800 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures) |
| |
On 02/18/2015 01:14 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 07:37:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Guenter, >> >> [Add Ralf to cc] >> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>> >>> Build results: >>> total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12 >>> Failed builds: >>> mips:defconfig >>> mips:allmodconfig >>> mips:bcm47xx_defconfig >>> mips:bcm63xx_defconfig >>> mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig >>> mips:ath79_defconfig >>> mips:ar7_defconfig >>> mips:fuloong2e_defconfig >>> mips:e55_defconfig >>> mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig >>> mips:malta_defconfig >>> sparc64:allmodconfig >>> >>> mips builds are all failing with >>> >>> Building mips:defconfig ... failed >>> -------------- >>> Error log: >>> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S: Assembler messages: >>> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: Bad value (mips64r6) for internal use >>> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: unknown ISA level 64r6 >>> >>> This was introduced by commit 0bf705e94771800 ("MIPS: kernel: genex: Set >>> correct ISA level") which apparently assumes that only mips64r6 is a valid >>> ISA level, though it is obviously not supported on older compilers. This >>> is on top of the other mips r6 related build errors seen yesterday. >>> >>> I really hope that this is not 3.20 material, given the lack of testing >>> with architectures other than mips r6 or with older compilers. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > > This is just a typo I introduced yesterday by mistake. This has been fixed in > the meantime but it did not make it in today's linux-next. > Yes, but it is not the only r6 related bug. Did you fix all the others as well ?
Guenter
|  |