[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 34/35] tick: Provide tick_suspend_local()
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:15:09PM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <>
> >
> > This function is intended to use by the freezer once the freezer folks
> > solved their race issues. Also required to get rid of the ARM BL
> > switcher tick hackery.
> Totally agree with the patch(es), but I noticed that the ARM bL switcher
> does not depend on PM_SLEEP, so I do not think you can compile
> tick_{suspend/resume}_local() out if !PM_SLEEP, unless dependency
> is enforced by the ARM bL switcher config but I do not think that
> the config dependency really exists, Nico please correct me if I am
> wrong.

The ARM bL switcher does not depend on PM_SUSPEND nor does it enforce it
because it currently doesn't need it. So yeah, either PM_SUSPEND is
selected bringing quite a lot of code with it, or another symbol is used
for those functions (CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU maybe?).


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-17 19:01    [W:0.435 / U:10.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site