Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:09:57 +0900 | From | Yoshinori Sato <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal |
| |
At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:38:25 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato > <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote: > > + usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain > > + && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap > > + && sig < 32 > > + ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig] > > + : sig; > > Does h8300 really need signal mapping? > I'm very sure you can drop this. > In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have > only a single (broken) > in-tree user. >
I agree. It remove forgot.
> -- > Thanks, > //richard
-- Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
|  |