[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 6/9] livepatch: create per-task consistency model
On 02/12/2015, 04:21 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Ingo, Peter,
> Would you have any objections to making task_rq_lock/unlock() non-static
> (or moving them to kernel/sched/sched.h) so they can be called by the
> livepatch code?
> To provide some background, I'm looking for a way to temporarily prevent
> a sleeping task from running while its stack is examined, to decide
> whether it can be safely switched to the new patching "universe". For
> more details see klp_transition_task() in the patch below.
> Using task_rq_lock() is the most straightforward way I could find to
> achieve that.

Hi, I cannot speak whether it is the proper way or not.

But if so, would it make sense to do the opposite: expose an API to walk
through the processes' stack and make the decision? Concretely, move
parts of klp_stacktrace_address_verify_func to sched.c or somewhere in
kernel/sched/ and leave task_rq_lock untouched.

suse labs

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-12 14:41    [W:0.286 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site