lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 3.12.33 - BUG xfrm_selector_match+0x25/0x2f6

Hello,

On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:

> thank you for the fast responses! I would like to test any patch for 3.12.

I'm attaching a patch that avoids rerouting in
IPVS for LOCAL_IN. Please test it in your setup. My tests
were with NAT on today's net tree. I checked that it
compiles for 3.12.33. You can use the default snat_reroute=1.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>From 4fc493f8f1ed967b1e3dd6d330a25bad762516d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 18:13:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH net] ipvs: rerouting to local clients is not needed anymore

commit f5a41847acc5 ("ipvs: move ip_route_me_harder for ICMP")
from 2.6.37 introduced ip_route_me_harder() call for responses to
local clients, so that we can provide valid rt_src after SNAT.
It was used by TCP to provide valid daddr for ip_send_reply().
After commit 0a5ebb8000c5 ("ipv4: Pass explicit daddr arg to
ip_send_reply()." from 3.0 this rerouting is not needed anymore
and should be avoided, especially in LOCAL_IN.

Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index 990decb..b87ca32 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -659,16 +659,24 @@ static inline int ip_vs_gather_frags(struct sk_buff *skb, u_int32_t user)
return err;
}

-static int ip_vs_route_me_harder(int af, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static int ip_vs_route_me_harder(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ unsigned int hooknum)
{
+ if (!sysctl_snat_reroute(skb))
+ return 0;
+ /* Reroute replies only to remote clients (FORWARD and LOCAL_OUT) */
+ if (NF_INET_LOCAL_IN == hooknum)
+ return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
if (af == AF_INET6) {
- if (sysctl_snat_reroute(skb) && ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
+ struct dst_entry *dst = skb_dst(skb);
+
+ if (dst->dev && !(dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) &&
+ ip6_route_me_harder(skb) != 0)
return 1;
} else
#endif
- if ((sysctl_snat_reroute(skb) ||
- skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
+ if (!(skb_rtable(skb)->rt_flags & RTCF_LOCAL) &&
ip_route_me_harder(skb, RTN_LOCAL) != 0)
return 1;

@@ -791,7 +799,8 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
union nf_inet_addr *snet,
__u8 protocol, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
- unsigned int offset, unsigned int ihl)
+ unsigned int offset, unsigned int ihl,
+ unsigned int hooknum)
{
unsigned int verdict = NF_DROP;

@@ -821,7 +830,7 @@ static int handle_response_icmp(int af, struct sk_buff *skb,
#endif
ip_vs_nat_icmp(skb, pp, cp, 1);

- if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
+ if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb, hooknum))
goto out;

/* do the statistics and put it back */
@@ -916,7 +925,7 @@ static int ip_vs_out_icmp(struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,

snet.ip = iph->saddr;
return handle_response_icmp(AF_INET, skb, &snet, cih->protocol, cp,
- pp, ciph.len, ihl);
+ pp, ciph.len, ihl, hooknum);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6
@@ -981,7 +990,8 @@ static int ip_vs_out_icmp_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,
snet.in6 = ciph.saddr.in6;
writable = ciph.len;
return handle_response_icmp(AF_INET6, skb, &snet, ciph.protocol, cp,
- pp, writable, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
+ pp, writable, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr),
+ hooknum);
}
#endif

@@ -1040,7 +1050,8 @@ static inline bool is_new_conn(const struct sk_buff *skb,
*/
static unsigned int
handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
- struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)
+ struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph,
+ unsigned int hooknum)
{
struct ip_vs_protocol *pp = pd->pp;

@@ -1078,7 +1089,7 @@ handle_response(int af, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,
* if it came from this machine itself. So re-compute
* the routing information.
*/
- if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb))
+ if (ip_vs_route_me_harder(af, skb, hooknum))
goto drop;

IP_VS_DBG_PKT(10, af, pp, skb, 0, "After SNAT");
@@ -1181,7 +1192,7 @@ ip_vs_out(unsigned int hooknum, struct sk_buff *skb, int af)
cp = pp->conn_out_get(af, skb, &iph, 0);

if (likely(cp))
- return handle_response(af, skb, pd, cp, &iph);
+ return handle_response(af, skb, pd, cp, &iph, hooknum);
if (sysctl_nat_icmp_send(net) &&
(pp->protocol == IPPROTO_TCP ||
pp->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP ||
--
1.9.3
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-07 20:01    [W:0.087 / U:0.780 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site