[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/6] net-PPP: Deletion of a few unnecessary checks
Hi Markus,

On 20.12.2014 15:45, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> I'm saying to leave the code alone.
> Do I need to try another interpretation out for your feedback?
>> If it goes:
>> var = foo_that_returns_ptr_err()
>> if (IS_ERR(var))
>> return PTR_ERR(var);
>> p->bar = var;
>> or whatever, simply keep it that way!
> Do you want to express here that a data structure member should
> only be set after a previous function call succeeded?

I think what David said was pretty clear: If you see code like the above
there is no need to refactor it. That does not mean that this is the
_preferred_ way of error handling. Its just good enough to be left alone.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-20 17:21    [W:1.536 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site