[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/6] net-PPP: Deletion of a few unnecessary checks
> I'm saying to leave the code alone.

Do I need to try another interpretation out for your feedback?

> If it goes:
> var = foo_that_returns_ptr_err()
> if (IS_ERR(var))
> return PTR_ERR(var);
> p->bar = var;
> or whatever, simply keep it that way!

Do you want to express here that a data structure member should
only be set after a previous function call succeeded?

> I'm not engaging in this conversation any further, you have
> already consumed way too much of my limited time on this
> incredibly trivial matter.

I hope that you will find a bit time and patience again
to clarify affected implementation details in a safer and
unambiguous way.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-20 16:21    [W:0.635 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site